Cohesion and Coherence in the Writing of Libyan EFL Learners

Authors

  • Majida Omar Abida English Language Department, Gharyan Language Center, University of Gharyan, Libya Author
  • Fatima Khalifa Mohommed English Language Department, Gharyan Language Center, University of Gharyan, Libya Author

Keywords:

cohesion, coherence, cohesive ties, conjunction, discourse

Abstract

Cohesive devices are fundamental to the linguistic system and are central to constructing readable texts. Research indicates that students often struggle to understand how cohesive ties function to achieve a communicative purpose and improve comprehension. This study employs a

qualitative design to analyze the descriptive texts of students at the Gharian language center. Grounded in Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) theoretical framework, the research addresses the observed misunderstanding and lack of awareness of cohesion among learners, which frequently results in the inappropriate use of cohesive devices in their assignments.

Consequently, the study examines the semantic relationships between ideas within the students’ texts. The findings provide feedback for instructors, recommending that cohesion and coherence be taught intensively throughout the academic year. The research emphasizes the need to dedicate more instructional time to sub-skills, such as the effective use of cohesive ties, to create semantically coherent written pieces. This approach necessitates a direct focus on explicit writing instruction. For example, conjunctions—as a key cohesive device—should be taught explicitly with sufficient practice to ensure students can master their application in writing assignments.

 

1. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.‏

2. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-16.‏

3. Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&c Black.‏

4. Forney, M. (2001). Razzle Dazzle Writing: Achieving Excellence Through 50 Writing Target Skills. Maupin House Publishing, Inc.

5. Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts: a study of some grammatical and lexical features of English discourse (Vol. 204). The Hague: Mouton & Co.‏

6. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, Routledge.‏

7. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in english. Routledge.‏

8. Ingels, M. (2006). Legal English communication skills. Acco.‏

9. Jalilifar, A. (2008). Discourse Markers in Composition Writings: The Case of Iranian Learners of English as a Foreign Language. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 114-122.‏

10. Lee, I. (2002). Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of second language writing, 11(2), 135-159.

11. Li, F. E. N. G. (2010). Discourse markers in English writing. The Journal of International Social Research, 3, 299-305.‏

12. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic english. Pearson.‏

13. Phillips, E. (2002). English for Libya: Secondary 3: English specialization: language and culture: Teacher’s book. Reading: Garnet.‏

14. Abdul Rahman, Z. A. A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive writing by Omani student-teachers. Sage Open, 3(4), 2158244013506715.‏

15. Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460.‏

16. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications.‏

Downloads

Published

2025-03-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Majida Omar Abida, & Fatima Khalifa Mohommed. (2025). Cohesion and Coherence in the Writing of Libyan EFL Learners. Libyan Journal of Educational Research and E-Learning (LJERE), 1(1), 53-60. https://ljere.com.ly/index.php/ljere/article/view/11